Sofroniew, M. V. Dissecting spinal cord regeneration. Nature 557, 343–350 (2018).
Anderson, M. A. et al. Natural and targeted circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Nature Neurosci. 25, 1584–1596 (2022).
Courtine, G. & Sofroniew, M. V. Spinal cord repair: advances in biology and technology. Nat. Med. 25, 898–908 (2019).
Ahuja, C. S. et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 3, 17018 (2017).
Rowald, A. et al. Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat. Med. 28, 260–271 (2022).
Squair, J. W. et al. Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury. Nature 590, 308–314 (2021).
Wagner, F. B. et al. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature 563, 65–71 (2018).
Kathe, C. et al. The neurons that restore walking after paralysis. Nature 611, 540–547 (2022).
Popovich, P. G., Wei, P. & Stokes, B. T. Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 377, 443–464 (1997).
Anderson, M. A. et al. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532, 195–200 (2016).
Squair, J. W., Gautier, M., Sofroniew, M. V., Courtine, G. & Anderson, M. A. Engineering spinal cord repair. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 72, 48–53 (2021).
Asboth, L. et al. Cortico-reticulo-spinal circuit reorganization enables functional recovery after severe spinal cord contusion. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 576–588 (2018).
Scheff, S. W., Rabchevsky, A. G., Fugaccia, I., Main, J. A. & Lumpp, J. E. Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device. J. Neurotraum. 20, 179–193 (2003).
Dusart, I. & Schwab, M. E. Secondary cell death and the inflammatory reaction after dorsal hemisection of the rat spinal cord. Eur. J. Neurosci. 6, 712–724 (1994).
Zappia, L. & Oshlack, A. Clustering trees: a visualization for evaluating clusterings at multiple resolutions. Gigascience 7, giy083 (2018).
Milich, L. M. et al. Single-cell analysis of the cellular heterogeneity and interactions in the injured mouse spinal cord. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20210040 (2021).
Sofroniew, M. V. & Vinters, H. V. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 7–35 (2010).
Faulkner, J. R. et al. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 24, 2143–2155 (2004).
Herrmann, J. E. et al. STAT3 is a critical regulator of astrogliosis and scar formation after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 28, 7231–7243 (2008).
Wanner, I. B. et al. Glial scar borders are formed by newly proliferated, elongated astrocytes that interact to corral inflammatory and fibrotic cells via STAT3-dependent mechanisms after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 33, 12870–12886 (2013).
Zheng, S. C. et al. Universal prediction of cell-cycle position using transfer learning. Genome Biol. 23, 41 (2022).
Munji, R. N. et al. Profiling the mouse brain endothelial transcriptome in health and disease models reveals a core blood–brain barrier dysfunction module. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1892–1902 (2019).
Zeisel, A. et al. Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell 174, 999–1014.e22 (2018).
Yasuda, K. et al. Drug transporters on arachnoid barrier cells contribute to the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier. Drug Metab. Dispos. 41, 923–931 (2013).
Dewar, D., Underhill, S. M. & Goldberg, M. P. Oligodendrocytes and ischemic brain injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metabol. 23, 263–274 (2002).
Petracca, Y. L. et al. The late and dual origin of cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons in the mouse spinal cord. Development 143, 880–891 (2016).
Vígh, B. et al. The system of cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons. Its supposed role in the nonsynaptic signal transmission of the brain. Histol. Histopathol. 19, 607–628 (2004).
Squair, J. W. et al. Recovery of walking after paralysis by regenerating characterized neurons to their natural target region. Science 381, 1338–1345 (2023).
Courtine, G. et al. Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nat. Med. 14, 69–74 (2008).
Skinnider, M. A. et al. Cell type prioritization in single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 30–34 (2021).
Squair, J. W., Skinnider, M. A., Gautier, M., Foster, L. J. & Courtine, G. Prioritization of cell types responsive to biological perturbations in single-cell data with Augur. Nat. Protoc. 16, 3836–3873 (2021).
Renthal, W. et al. Transcriptional reprogramming of distinct peripheral sensory neuron subtypes after axonal injury. Neuron 108, 128–144.e9 (2020).
Nguyen, M. Q., Pichon, C. E. L. & Ryba, N. Stereotyped transcriptomic transformation of somatosensory neurons in response to injury. eLife 8, e49679 (2019).
Cajal, S. R. Y. & May, R. M. Cajal’s Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991).
Sperry, R. W. Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 50, 703–710 (1963).
Cajal, S. R. Y. Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System (Oxford Univ. Press, 1928).
Anderson, M. A. et al. Required growth facilitators propel axon regeneration across complete spinal cord injury. Nature 561, 396–400 (2018).
Harel, N. Y. & Strittmatter, S. M. Can regenerating axons recapitulate developmental guidance during recovery from spinal cord injury?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 603–616 (2006).
Mironova, Y. A. & Giger, R. J. Where no synapses go: gatekeepers of circuit remodeling and synaptic strength. Trends Neurosci. 36, 363–373 (2013).
Lin, A. C. & Holt, C. E. Local translation and directional steering in axons. EMBO J. 26, 3729–3736 (2007).
Short, D., Masry, W. E. & Jones, P. High dose methylprednisolone in the management of acute spinal cord injury–a systematic review from a clinical perspective. Spinal Cord 38, 273–286 (2000).
Bracken, M. B. Efficacy of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. JAMA 251, 45 (1984).
Hurlbert, R. J. Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: an inappropriate standard of care. J. Neurosurg. Spine 93, 1–7 (2000).
Klein, S. L. & Flanagan, K. L. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 626–638 (2016).
Gal-Oz, S. T. et al. ImmGen report: sexual dimorphism in the immune system transcriptome. Nat. Commun. 10, 4295 (2019).
Mattucci, S. et al. Basic biomechanics of spinal cord injury—how injuries happen in people and how animal models have informed our understanding. Clin. Biomech. 64, 58–68 (2018).
O’Shea, T. M. et al. Lesion environments direct transplanted neural progenitors towards a wound repair astroglial phenotype in mice. Nat. Commun. 13, 5702 (2022).
Squair, J. W. et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5692 (2021).
Granja, J. M. et al. ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Nat. Genet. 53, 403–411 (2021).
Kang, J. B. et al. Efficient and precise single-cell reference atlas mapping with Symphony. Nat. Commun. 12, 5890 (2021).
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. Nat. Methods 14, 975–978 (2017).
Schwarzschild, M. A., Cole, R. L. & Hyman, S. E. Glutamate, but not dopamine, stimulates stress-activated protein kinase and AP-1-mediated transcription in striatal neurons. J. Neurosci. 17, 3455–3466 (1997).
Burda, J. E. et al. Divergent transcriptional regulation of astrocyte reactivity across disorders. Nature 606, 557–564 (2022).
Pollard, K. S., Hubisz, M. J., Rosenbloom, K. R. & Siepel, A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res. 20, 110–121 (2010).
Christian, C. A. et al. Endogenous positive allosteric modulation of GABAA receptors by diazepam binding inhibitor. Neuron 78, 1063–1074 (2013).
Chung, K. & Deisseroth, K. CLARITY for mapping the nervous system. Nat. Methods 10, 508–513 (2013).
Olsson, A.-K., Dimberg, A., Kreuger, J. & Claesson-Welsh, L. VEGF receptor signalling? in control of vascular function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 7, 359–371 (2006).
Li, Y. et al. Microglia-organized scar-free spinal cord repair in neonatal mice. Nature 587, 613–618 (2020).
Li, C. et al. Temporal and spatial cellular and molecular pathological alterations with single-cell resolution in the adult spinal cord after injury. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7, 65 (2022).
Wells, J. E. A., Hurlbert, R. J., Fehlings, M. G. & Yong, V. W. Neuroprotection by minocycline facilitates significant recovery from spinal cord injury in mice. Brain 126, 1628–1637 (2003).
Stirling, D. P. et al. Minocycline treatment reduces delayed oligodendrocyte death, attenuates axonal dieback, and improves functional outcome after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 24, 2182–2190 (2004).
Festoff, B. W. et al. Minocycline neuroprotects, reduces microgliosis, and inhibits caspase protease expression early after spinal cord injury. J. Neurochem. 97, 1314–1326 (2006).
Rabchevsky, A. G., Fugaccia, I., Sullivan, P. G., Blades, D. A. & Scheff, S. W. Efficacy of methylprednisolone therapy for the injured rat spinal cord. J. Neurosci. Res. 68, 7–18 (2002).
James, N. D. et al. Chondroitinase gene therapy improves upper limb function following cervical contusion injury. Exp. Neurol. 271, 131–135 (2015).
Muir, E. M. et al. Modification of N-glycosylation sites allows secretion of bacterial chondroitinase ABC from mammalian cells. J. Biotechnol. 145, 103–110 (2010).
Bartus, K. et al. Large-scale chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan digestion with chondroitinase gene therapy leads to reduced pathology and modulates macrophage phenotype following spinal cord contusion injury. J. Neurosci. 34, 4822–4836 (2014).
Esposito, M. S., Capelli, P. & Arber, S. Brainstem nucleus MdV mediates skilled forelimb motor tasks. Nature 508, 351–356 (2014).
Kathe, C. et al. Wireless closed-loop optogenetics across the entire spinal cord in ecological environments. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 198–208 (2022).
Takeoka, A., Vollenweider, I., Courtine, G. & Arber, S. Muscle spindle feedback directs locomotor recovery and circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Cell 159, 1626–1639 (2014).
Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1281–1289 (2018).
Chung, K. et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332–337 (2013).
Tomer, R., Ye, L., Hsueh, B. & Deisseroth, K. Advanced CLARITY for rapid and high-resolution imaging of intact tissues. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1682–1697 (2014).
Voigt, F. F. et al. The mesoSPIM initiative: open-source light-sheet microscopes for imaging cleared tissue. Nat. Methods 16, 1105–1108 (2019).
Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).
Caglayan, E., Liu, Y. & Konopka, G. Neuronal ambient RNA contamination causes misinterpreted and masked cell types in brain single-nuclei datasets. Neuron 110, 4043–4056.e5 (2022).
Fleming, S. J. et al. Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender. Nat. Methods 20, 1323–1335 (2023).
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).
McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M. & Gartner, Z. J. DoubletFinder: doublet detection in single-cell RNA sequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Syst 8, 329–337.e4 (2019).
Germain, P.-L., Lun, A., Meixide, C. G., Macnair, W. & Robinson, M. D. Doublet identification in single-cell sequencing data using scDblFinder. F1000Res. 10, 979 (2021).
Bais, A. S. & Kostka, D. scds: computational annotation of doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Bioinformatics 36, 1150–1158 (2019).
Xi, N. M. & Li, J. J. Benchmarking computational doublet-detection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Cell Syst. 12, 176–194.e6 (2021).
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
Osseward, P. J. et al. Conserved genetic signatures parcellate cardinal spinal neuron classes into local and projection subsets. Science 372, 385–393 (2021).
Häring, M. et al. Neuronal atlas of the dorsal horn defines its architecture and links sensory input to transcriptional cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 869–880 (2018).
Alkaslasi, M. R. et al. Single nucleus RNA-sequencing defines unexpected diversity of cholinergic neuron types in the adult mouse spinal cord. Nat. Commun. 12, 2471 (2021).
Blum, J. A. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of the adult mouse spinal cord reveals molecular diversity of autonomic and skeletal motor neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 572–583 (2021).
Delile, J. et al. Single cell transcriptomics reveals spatial and temporal dynamics of gene expression in the developing mouse spinal cord. Development 146, dev173807 (2019).
Hamel, R. et al. Time-resolved single-cell RNAseq profiling identifies a novel Fabp5-expressing subpopulation of inflammatory myeloid cells in chronic spinal cord injury. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.21.346635 (2020).
Hayashi, M. et al. Graded arrays of spinal and supraspinal v2a interneuron subtypes underlie forelimb and hindlimb motor control. Neuron 97, 869–884.e5 (2018).
Rosenberg, A. B. et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360, 176–182 (2018).
Sathyamurthy, A. et al. Massively parallel single nucleus transcriptional profiling defines spinal cord neurons and their activity during behavior. Cell Rep. 22, 2216–2225 (2018).
Wahane, S. et al. Diversified transcriptional responses of myeloid and glial cells in spinal cord injury shaped by HDAC3 activity. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd8811 (2021).
Baek, M., Menon, V., Jessell, T. M., Hantman, A. W. & Dasen, J. S. Molecular logic of spinocerebellar tract neuron diversity and connectivity. Cell Rep. 27, 2620–2635.e4 (2019).
Vanlandewijck, M. et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480 (2018).
Marques, S. et al. Oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in the mouse juvenile and adult central nervous system. Science 352, 1326–1329 (2016).
O′Shea, T. M. et al. Border-forming wound repair astrocytes. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.25.554857 (2023).
Liddelow, S. A. et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541, 481–487 (2017).
Tirosh, I. et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352, 189–196 (2016).
Hou, W. & Ji, Z. Palo: spatially aware color palette optimization for single-cell and spatial data. Bioinformatics 38, 3654–3656 (2022).
Koopmans, F. et al. SynGO: an evidence-based, expert-curated knowledge base for the synapse. Neuron 103, 217–234.e4 (2019).
Büttner, M., Ostner, J., Müller, C. L., Theis, F. J. & Schubert, B. scCODA is a Bayesian model for compositional single-cell data analysis. Nat. Commun. 12, 6876 (2021).
Phipson, B. et al. propeller: testing for differences in cell type proportions in single cell data. Bioinformatics 38, 4720–4726 (2022).
Simmons, S. Cell type composition analysis: comparison of statistical methods. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.04.479123 (2022).
Zimmerman, K. D., Espeland, M. A. & Langefeld, C. D. A practical solution to pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies. Nat. Commun. 12, 738 (2021).
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Fornes, O. et al. JASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D87–D92 (2020).
Cable, D. M. et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00830-w (2021).
McKenzie, A. T., Katsyv, I., Song, W.-M., Wang, M. & Zhang, B. DGCA: a comprehensive R package for differential gene correlation analysis. BMC Syst. Biol. 10, 106 (2016).
Biancalani, T. et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nat. Methods 18, 1352–1362 (2021).
