The Sacramento Kings' Isaiah Thomas (22) reacts by throwing his head band in the air after missing a 14-footer to end the game during the Kings 97-95 loss against the Oklahoma City Thunder.

Basketballer Isaiah Thomas reacts after missing a crucial shot. Credit: Hector Amezcua/Sacramento Bee/Tribune News Service via Getty

Have you ever been in a high-stakes situation in which you needed to perform but completely bombed? You’re not alone. Experiments in monkeys reveal that ‘choking’ under pressure is linked to a drop in activity in the neurons that prepare for movement1.

“You see it across the board, you see it in sports, in all kinds of different sports and outside of sports as well.” says Steven Chase, a neuroscientist at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Chase and his colleagues investigated what happens in the brain that causes performance to plummet, and published their findings in Neuron on 12 September.

Choking under pressure is not unique to humans. In the same way that a tennis player might miss a match-winning shot, monkeys can also underperform in high-reward situations.

Winning jackpot

The team set up a computer task in which rhesus monkeys received a reward after quickly and accurately moving a cursor over a target. Each trial gave the monkeys cues as to whether the reward would be small, medium-sized, large or ‘jackpot’. Jackpot rewards were rare and unusually big, creating a high-stakes, high-reward situation.

Using a tiny, electrode-covered chip implanted into the monkeys’ brains, the team watched how neuronal activity changed between reward scenarios. The chip was situated on the motor cortex, an area of the frontal lobe that controls movement.

The researchers found that, in jackpot scenarios, the activity of neurons associated with motor preparation decreased. Motor preparation is the brain’s way of making calculations about how to complete a movement — similar to lining up an arrow on a target before unleashing it. The drop in motor preparation meant that the monkey’s brains were underprepared, and so they underperformed.

The results “help us understand how reward-outcome-mediated behaviour is not linear”, says Bita Moghaddam, a behavioural neuroscientist at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland.

To a certain extent, “you just don’t perform better as the reward increases”, Moghaddam says. It would also be interesting to see how other brain regions respond in jackpot-reward situations, she adds, because multiple regions could be involved.

Peak preparedness

The researchers then investigated why motor preparation decreases in high-stakes scenarios. An analysis of how the motivation of rewards and neural preparation was related to monkeys’ performance suggested that, as the size of a reward increases, neural activity reaches a point of peak preparedness. For even larger rewards, preparedness begins to wane, pushing the brain out of its sweet spot for performance. The researchers call this the neural-bias hypothesis.

The team is also interested in whether choking under pressure can be avoided, Chase says. For example, he wonders whether getting feedback on one’s brain activity could help to optimize performance. But first, the team will need to study the phenomenon more in humans, he says.



Source link


administrator