Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. Meiosis: dances between homologs. Annu. Rev. Genet. 57, 1–63 (2023).
Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32, 619–697 (1998).
Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 603–754 (1999).
Bennett, M. D. The time and duration of meiosis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 277, 201–226 (1977).
Jin, Q., Trelles-Sticken, E., Scherthan, H. & Loidl, J. Yeast nuclei display prominent centromere clustering that is reduced in nondividing cells and in meiotic prophase. J. Cell Biol. 141, 21–29 (1998).
Ding, D.-Q., Yamamoto, A., Haraguchi, T. & Hiraoka, Y. Dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. Dev. Cell 6, 329–341 (2004).
Shibuya, H., Morimoto, A. & Watanabe, Y. The dissection of meiotic chromosome movement in mice using an in vivo electroporation technique. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004821 (2014).
Chacón, M. R., Delivani, P. & Tolić, I. M. Meiotic nuclear oscillations are necessary to avoid excessive chromosome associations. Cell Rep. 17, 1632–1645 (2016).
Link, J. & Jantsch, V. Meiotic chromosomes in motion: a perspective from Mus musculus and Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 128, 317–330 (2019).
Fan, J., Jin, H., Koch, B. A. & Yu, H.-G. Mps2 links Csm4 and Mps3 to form a telomere-associated LINC complex in budding yeast. Life Sci. Alliance 3, e202000824 (2020).
Lee, C.-Y. et al. Extranuclear structural components that mediate dynamic chromosome movements in yeast meiosis. Curr. Biol. 30, 1207–1216.e4 (2020).
Nozaki, T., Chang, F., Weiner, B. & Kleckner, N. High temporal resolution 3D live-cell imaging of budding yeast meiosis defines discontinuous actin/telomere-mediated chromosome motion, correlated nuclear envelope deformation and actin filament dynamics. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 3001 (2021).
Koszul, R., Kim, K. P., Prentiss, M., Kleckner, N. & Kameoka, S. Meiotic chromosomes move by linkage to dynamic actin cables with transduction of force through the nuclear envelope. Cell 133, 1188–1201 (2008).
Scherthan, H. et al. Chromosome mobility during meiotic prophase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16934–16939 (2007).
Storlazzi, A. et al. Recombination proteins mediate meiotic spatial chromosome organization and pairing. Cell 141, 94–106 (2010).
Hunter, N. Meiotic recombination: the essence of heredity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a016618 (2015).
Dubois, E. et al. Building bridges to move recombination complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12400–12409 (2019).
Lake, C. M. & Hawley, R. S. Synaptonemal complex. Curr. Biol. 31, R225–R227 (2021).
Henderson, K. A. & Keeney, S. Synaptonemal complex formation: where does it start? Bioessays 27, 995–998 (2005).
Bishop, D. K. & Zickler, D. Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117, 9–15 (2004).
Zhang, L., Espagne, E., de Muyt, A., Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. E. Interference-mediated synaptonemal complex formation with embedded crossover designation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5059–E5068 (2014).
Ito, M., Fujita, Y. & Shinohara, A. Positive and negative regulators of RAD51/DMC1 in homologous recombination and DNA replication. DNA Repair 134, 103613 (2024).
Shinohara, M., Sakai, K., Shinohara, A. & Bishop, D. K. Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway. Genetics 163, 1273–1286 (2003).
Shinohara, A., Gasior, S., Ogawa, T., Kleckner, N. & Bishop, D. K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells 2, 615–629 (1997).
Sym, M., Engebrecht, J. A. & Roeder, G. S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72, 365–378 (1993).
Brown, M. S., Grubb, J., Zhang, A., Rust, M. J. & Bishop, D. K. Small Rad51 and Dmc1 complexes often co-occupy both ends of a meiotic DNA double strand break. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005653 (2015).
Börner, G. V., Kleckner, N. & Hunter, N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117, 29–45 (2004).
Fung, J. C., Rockmill, B., Odell, M. & Roeder, G. S. Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 116, 795–802 (2004).
Kim, K. P. et al. Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 143, 924–937 (2010).
Borde, V., Goldman, A. S. & Lichten, M. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science 290, 806–809 (2000).
Pratto, F. et al. Meiotic recombination mirrors patterns of germline replication in mice and humans. Cell 184, 4251–4267.e20 (2021).
Wanat, J. J. et al. Csm4, in collaboration with Ndj1, mediates telomere-led chromosome dynamics and recombination during yeast meiosis. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000188 (2008).
He, W. et al. Regulated proteolysis of MutSγ controls meiotic crossing over. Mol. Cell 78, 168–183.e5 (2020).
Goldman, A. S. & Lichten, M. Restriction of ectopic recombination by interhomolog interactions during Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9537–9542 (2000).
Ganji, M. et al. Real-time imaging of DNA loop extrusion by condensin. Science 360, 102–105 (2018).
Kong, M. et al. Human Condensin I and II drive extensive ATP-dependent compaction of nucleosome-bound DNA. Mol. Cell 79, 99–114.e9 (2020).
Strom, A. R. et al. Condensate interfacial forces reposition DNA loci and probe chromatin viscoelasticity. Cell 187, 5282–5297.e20 (2024).
Tang, M. et al. Establishment of dsDNA-dsDNA interactions by the condensin complex. Mol. Cell 83, 3787–3800.e9 (2023).
White, M. A., Weiner, B., Chu, L., Lim, G. & Kleckner, N. E. Crossover interference mediates multiscale patterning along meiotic chromosomes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.28.577645 (2024).
de Boer, E., Stam, P., Dietrich, A. J. J., Pastink, A. & Heyting, C. Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9607–9612 (2006).
Yadav, V. K. & Claeys Bouuaert, C. Mechanism and control of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in S. cerevisiae. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 642737 (2021).
Anderson, L. K. & Stack, S. M. Nodules associated with axial cores and synaptonemal complexes during zygotene in Psilotum nudum. Chromosoma 97, 96–100 (1988).
Koornneef, L. et al. Chromosome pairing through tensioned DNA tethers revealed by BRCA2 meiotic domain deletion. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.06.561239 (2023).
Holm, P. B. Three-dimensional reconstruction of chromosome pairing during the zygotene stage of meiosis in Lilium longiflorum (Thunb.). Carlsberg Res. Commun. 42, 103 (1977).
Kezer, J., Sessions, S. K. & León, P. The meiotic structure and behavior of the strongly heteromorphic X/Y sex chromosomes of neotropical plethodontid salamanders of the genus Oedipina. Chromosoma 98, 433–442 (1989).
Zickler, D. Development of the synaptonemal complex and the ‘recombination nodules’ during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw. Chromosoma 61, 289–316 (1977).
Zhang, L., Liang, Z., Hutchinson, J. & Kleckner, N. Crossover patterning by the beam-film model: analysis and implications. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004042 (2014).
Lau, I. F. et al. Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes. Mol. Microbiol. 49, 731–743 (2003).
Shaner, N. C. et al. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1567–1572 (2004).
Edelstein, A. D. et al. Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. J. Biol. Methods 1, e10 (2014).
Chang, F. Low SNR Computational Pattern Detection Applied to Multi-spectral 3D Molecular Dynamics. PhD thesis, Harvard Univ. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42015127 (2018).
Tinevez, J.-Y. et al. TrackMate: an open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods 115, 80–90 (2017).
Killick, R. & Eckley, I. A. Changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 58, 1–19 (2014).
Miné-Hattab, J. & Rothstein, R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 510–517 (2012).
Hunter, N. & Kleckner, N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106, 59–70 (2001).
Conrad, M. N. et al. Rapid telomere movement in meiotic prophase is promoted by NDJ1, MPS3, and CSM4 and is modulated by recombination. Cell 133, 1175–1187 (2008).
