(RNS) — Hundreds of thousands of people are walking around alive today because other people have donated organs for transplantation. Every year we set new records for this practice: In 2023, there were more than 46,000 life-saving organ transplants.

In a real and undeniable sense, this is a very good thing. I have people in my own life who otherwise would not be here — and you likely do as well. In a Catholic context, the church speaks clearly in favor of organ donation: St. John Paul II, writing in his great pro-life encyclical “Evangelium Vitae,” calls donation of such organs “particularly praiseworthy.” The church I grew up in and the Catholics I grew up with simply took this for granted, one reason why I remain an organ donor to this day.

If I’m honest with myself, however, I’m much more uneasy about my donor status than I was even 10 years ago. I’m by no means alone: new questions are being asked, making the decision much more complicated. John Paul insisted that such donations take place in “an ethically acceptable manner,” and as I’ve explored our practices of organ donation in more detail in recent years, it seems clear that there are practices that are, at the very least, ethically problematic.

Here are some suggested questions to ask yourself if you are thinking of becoming an organ donor, or if you want to remain one.

First, are you only a consequentialist when it comes to organ donation? That is, do you think we need to do what is necessary to maximize organ donation and save the maximum number of lives possible? Or do you believe some rules should be in place to limit the practice?

Almost everyone, for instance, would object to rounding up homeless people to take their organs, even if that resulted in more lives being saved overall. Informed consent is essential. Also important for many is the “dead donor rule” — the idea that we cannot kill people for their organs; they must already be dead.

(Photo by Bret Kavanaugh/Unsplash/Creative Commons)

If you believe in the dead donor rule, do you believe that brain death is death? There are new challenges to this position that may put us in very difficult positions. We must reckon with the history of “brain death”; the term was invented precisely to make it easier to procure organs for transplant. Today, people like Jahi McMath can be declared brain dead and after this declaration have their first period. Other people declared brain dead fight off infections and gestate children.

These new questions led the Uniform Commission to explore the question of brain death once again, but in summer 2023 the commission declared that there is no longer consensus on the question. Disturbingly, just a few weeks later the American Academy of Neurology pretended the same and even tried to make it easier to declare human beings dead if they had a catastrophic brain injury.

Third, how long should we wait after the heart stops beating before declaring someone dead? A typical waiting period for a transplant team is only five minutes (though some wait as little as two minutes). The longer they wait, the worse quality of organs they are likely to get for transplant.

But we would never think of someone as dead if their heart had only stopped for five minutes in other contexts: If EMTs come across someone who had arrested for five minutes, they don’t declare them dead; they try to restart their hearts. (If successful, no one thinks that a resurrection has just occurred. Can someone be dead five minutes after their heart stops if they are an organ donor — but not if they are not an organ donor?)

Next, can you be sure that transplant teams will not put undue pressure on medical teams to make you and others more available for transplant? There is not only a lot of good to be had by getting organs for transplant, but there are big-time financial incentives as well. A couple of weeks ago, The Wall Street Journal reported on a Kentucky organ procurement group that tried to get organs from a patient who was still alive and was able eventually to leave the hospital. More and more groups have proposals to mitigate this problem, but the problem remains.

Lastly, can you be sure our structures and systems are giving people properly informed consent in deciding whether or not to be organ donors? Departments of motor vehicles are increasingly run not by local governments but by private organizations. The state of Missouri now has offices issuing driver’s licenses by organ procurement corporations! The post detailing them has been removed, but web archives show that even the companies themselves admit it is “unconventional for an organ and tissue recovery agency to own and operate license offices.” 

Let us remind ourselves of the great good of organ donation. It saves tens of thousands of lives each year. But let’s also remind ourselves that, if we are not brute consequentialists, we need some ethical rules governing these practices. I hope the questions above help you discern whether these current organ donation practices are the kinds of things you would want to be a part of. And, if not, what kinds of reforms we need to push for in order to make them ethically acceptable. 



Source link


administrator