Wagen, C. C., McMinn, S. E., Kwan, E. E. & Jacobsen, E. N. Screening for generality in asymmetric catalysis. Nature 610, 680–686 (2022).
Rein, J. et al. Generality-oriented optimization of enantioselective aminoxyl radical catalysis. Science 380, 706–712 (2023).
Betinol, I. O., Lai, J., Thakur, S. & Reid, J. P. A data-driven workflow for assigning and predicting generality in asymmetric catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 12870–12883 (2023).
Kim, H. et al. A multi-substrate screening approach for the identification of a broadly applicable Diels–Alder catalyst. Nat. Commun. 10, 770 (2019).
Angello, N. H. et al. Closed-loop optimization of general reaction conditions for heteroaryl Suzuki-Miyaura coupling. Science 378, 399–405 (2022).
Rinehart, N. I. et al. A machine-learning tool to predict substrate-adaptive conditions for Pd-catalyzed C–N couplings. Science 381, 965–972 (2023).
Lattimore, T. & Szepesvári, C. Bandit Algorithms (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).
Sutton, R. S. & Barto, A. G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction 2nd edn (Bradford Books, 2018).
Slivkins, A. Introduction to multi-armed bandits. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/1904.07272v7 (2019).
White, J. M. Bandit Algorithms for Website Optimization: Developing, Deploying, and Debugging (O’Reilly Media, 2013).
Ruiz-Castillo, P. & Buchwald, S. L. Applications of palladium-catalyzed C–N cross-coupling reactions. Chem. Rev. 116, 12564–12649 (2016).
Ogba, O. M., Warner, N. C., O’Leary, D. J. & Grubbs, R. H. Recent advances in ruthenium-based olefin metathesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 4510–4544 (2018).
Kolb, H. C., VanNieuwenhze, M. S. & Sharpless, K. B. Catalytic asymmetric dihydroxylation. Chem. Rev. 94, 2483–2547 (1994).
Chatterjee, S., Guidi, M., Seeberger, P. H. & Gilmore, K. Automated radial synthesis of organic molecules. Nature 579, 379–384 (2020).
Echtermeyer, A., Amar, Y., Zakrzewski, J. & Lapkin, A. Self-optimisation and model-based design of experiments for developing a C–H activation flow process. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 13, 150–163 (2017).
Coley, C. W., Abolhasani, M., Lin, H. & Jensen, K. F. Material‐efficient microfluidic platform for exploratory studies of visible‐light photoredox catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 9847–9850 (2017).
Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L. & Cronin, L. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. Nature 559, 377–381 (2018).
Hsieh, H.-W., Coley, C. W., Baumgartner, L. M., Jensen, K. F. & Robinson, R. I. Photoredox iridium-nickel dual catalyzed decarboxylative arylation cross-coupling: from batch to continuous flow via self-optimizing segmented flow reactor. Org. Process Res. Dev. 22, 542–550 (2018).
Schweidtmann, A. M. et al. Machine learning meets continuous flow chemistry: automated optimization towards the Pareto front of multiple objectives. Chem. Eng. J. 352, 277–282 (2018).
Burger, B. et al. A mobile robotic chemist. Nature 583, 237–241 (2020).
Häse, F., Aldeghi, M., Hickman, R. J., Roch, L. M. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Gryffin: an algorithm for Bayesian optimization of categorical variables informed by expert knowledge. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 031406 (2021).
Taylor, C. J. et al. Accelerated chemical reaction optimization using multi-task learning. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 957–968 (2023).
Zhou, Z., Li, X. & Zare, R. N. Optimizing chemical reactions with deep reinforcement learning. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 1337–1344 (2017).
Torres, J. A. G. et al. A multi-objective active learning platform and web app for reaction optimization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 19999–20007 (2022).
Shields, B. J. et al. Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590, 89–96 (2021).
Häse, F., Roch, L. M., Kreisbeck, C. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Phoenics: a Bayesian optimizer for chemistry. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 1134–1145 (2018).
Clayton, A. D. et al. Algorithms for the self-optimisation of chemical reactions. React. Chem. Eng. 4, 1545–1554 (2019).
Reker, D., Hoyt, E. A., Bernardes, G. J. L. & Rodrigues, T. Adaptive optimization of chemical reactions with minimal experimental information. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 1, 100247 (2020).
Shim, E. et al. Predicting reaction conditions from limited data through active transfer learning. Chem. Sci. 13, 6655–6668 (2022).
Gao, H. et al. Using machine learning to predict suitable conditions for organic reactions. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 1465–1476 (2018).
Kozlowski, M. C. On the topic of substrate scope. Org. Lett. 24, 7247–7249 (2022).
Gensch, T. & Glorius, F. The straight dope on the scope of chemical reactions. Science 352, 294–295 (2016).
Dreher, S. D. Catalysis in medicinal chemistry. React. Chem. Eng. 4, 1530–1535 (2019).
Kariofillis, S. K. et al. Using data science to guide aryl bromide substrate scope analysis in a Ni/photoredox-catalyzed cross-coupling with acetals as alcohol-derived radical sources. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 1045–1055 (2022).
Dreher, S. D. & Krska, S. W. Chemistry informer libraries: conception, early experience, and role in the future of cheminformatics. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 1586–1596 (2021).
Collins, K. D. & Glorius, F. A robustness screen for the rapid assessment of chemical reactions. Nat. Chem. 5, 597–601 (2013).
Kullmer, C. N. P. et al. Accelerating reaction generality and mechanistic insight through additive mapping. Science 376, 532–539 (2022).
Taylor, C. J. et al. A brief introduction to chemical reaction optimization. Chem. Rev. 123, 3089–3126 (2023).
Svensson, H. G., Bjerrum, E. J., Tyrchan, C., Engkvist, O. & Chehreghani, M. H. Autonomous drug design with multi-armed bandits. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data 5584–5592 (IEEE, 2022).
Romeo Atance, S., Viguera Diez, J., Engkvist, O., Olsson, S. & Mercado, R. De novo drug design using reinforcement learning with graph-based deep generative models. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 4863–4872 (2022).
Xu, Z., Shim, E., Tewari, A. & Zimmerman, P. Adaptive sampling for discovery. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing System Vol. 35, 1114–1126 (NeurIPS, 2022).
Kaufmann, E., Cappe, O. & Garivier, A. On Bayesian upper confidence bounds for bandit problems. In Proc. Machine Learning Research Vol. 22, 592–600 (PMLR, 2012).
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N. & Fischer, P. Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Mach. Learn. 47, 235–256 (2002).
Snoek, J. et al. Scalable Bayesian optimization using deep neural networks. In Proc. Machine Learning Research Vol. 27, 2171–2180 (PMLR, 2015).
Stevens, J. M. et al. Advancing base metal catalysis through data science: insight and predictive models for Ni-catalyzed borylation through supervised machine learning. Organometallics 41, 1847–1864 (2022).
Nielsen, M. K., Ahneman, D. T., Riera, O. & Doyle, A. G. Deoxyfluorination with sulfonyl fluorides: navigating reaction space with machine learning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5004–5008 (2018).
Lin, S. et al. Mapping the dark space of chemical reactions with extended nanomole synthesis and MALDI-TOF MS. Science 361, eaar6236 (2018).
Ahneman, D. T., Estrada, J. G., Lin, S., Dreher, S. D. & Doyle, A. G. Predicting reaction performance in C–N cross-coupling using machine learning. Science 360, 186–190 (2018).
Brown, D. G. & Boström, J. Analysis of past and present synthetic methodologies on medicinal chemistry: where have all the new reactions gone? J. Med. Chem. 59, 4443–4458 (2016).
El-Faham, A. & Albericio, F. Peptide coupling reagents, more than a letter soup. Chem. Rev. 111, 6557–6602 (2011).
Dombrowski, A. W., Aguirre, A. L., Shrestha, A., Sarris, K. A. & Wang, Y. The chosen few: parallel library reaction methodologies for drug discovery. J. Org. Chem. 87, 1880–1897 (2022).
Matheron, G. Principles of geostatistics. Econ. Geol. 58, 1246–1266 (1963).
Zimmerman, D., Pavlik, C., Ruggles, A. & Armstrong, M. P. An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting. Math. Geol. 31, 375–390 (1999).
Magano, J. Large-scale amidations in process chemistry: practical considerations for reagent selection and reaction execution. Org. Process Res. Dev. 26, 1562–1689 (2022).
Beutner, G. L. et al. TCFH–NMI: direct access to N-acyl imidazoliums for challenging amide bond formations. Org. Lett. 20, 4218–4222 (2018).
Stevens, J. M. et al. Leveraging high-throughput experimentation to drive pharmaceutical route invention: a four-step commercial synthesis of branebrutinib (BMS-986195). Org. Process Res. Dev. 26, 1174–1183 (2022).
Sperry, J. B. et al. Thermal stability assessment of peptide coupling reagents commonly used in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Org. Process Res. Dev. 22, 1262–1275 (2018).
Zheng, B. et al. Preparation of the HIV attachment inhibitor BMS-663068. Part 6. Friedel–Crafts acylation/hydrolysis and amidation. Org. Process Res. Dev. 21, 1145–1155 (2017).
Krishnan, K. K., Ujwaldev, S. M., Sindhu, K. S. & Anilkumar, G. Recent advances in the transition metal catalyzed etherification reactions. Tetrahedron 72, 7393–7407 (2016).
Fuhrmann, E. & Talbiersky, J. Synthesis of alkyl aryl ethers by catalytic Williamson ether synthesis with weak alkylation agents. Org. Process Res. Dev. 9, 206–211 (2005).
Swamy, K. C. K., Kumar, N. N. B., Balaraman, E. & Kumar, K. V. P. P. Mitsunobu and related reactions: advances and applications. Chem. Rev. 109, 2551–2651 (2009).
