Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (John Murray, 1859).
Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, 1871).
Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 507–533 (1986).
MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. in Current Ornithology Vol. 14 (eds Nolan, V. et al.) 81–124 (Springer, 1997).
Darwin, C. & Wallace, A. On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 3, 45–62 (1858).
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, 1994).
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218, 384–387 (1982).
Potvin, D. A., Crawford, P. W., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. & MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A. Song repertoire size, not territory location, predicts reproductive success and territory tenure in a migratory songbird. Can. J. Zool. 93, 627–633 (2015).
Searcy, W. A. Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14, 281–286 (1984).
Nowicki, S. & Searcy, W. A. The evolution of vocal learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 28, 48–53 (2014).
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. A. & Peters, S. Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 1949–1954 (2002).
Kroodsma, D. E. Reproductive development in a female songbird: differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science 192, 574–575 (1976).
Baker, M. C., Bjerke, T. K., Lampe, H. U. & Espmark, Y. O. Sexual response of female yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoire sizes. Anim. Behav. 35, 395–401 (1987).
Beecher, M. D. & Brenowitz, E. A. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 143–149 (2005).
Tchernichovski, O., Mitra, P. P., Lints, T. & Nottebohm, F. Dynamics of the vocal imitation process: how a zebra finch learns its song. Science 291, 2564–2569 (2001).
Lipkind, D. et al. Stepwise acquisition of vocal combinatorial capacity in songbirds and human infants. Nature 498, 104–108 (2013).
Fehér, O., Wang, H., Saar, S., Mitra, P. P. & Tchernichovski, O. De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch. Nature 459, 564–568 (2009).
Lauay, C., Gerlach, N. M., Adkins-Regan, E. & DeVoogd, T. J. Female zebra finches require early song exposure to prefer high-quality song as adults. Anim. Behav. 68, 1249–1255 (2004).
Williams, H., Kilander, K. & Sotanski, M. L. Untutored song, reproductive success and song learning. Anim. Behav. 45, 695–705 (1993).
Svec, L. A. & Wade, J. Estradiol induces region-specific inhibition of ZENK but does not affect the behavioral preference for tutored song in adult female zebra finches. Behav. Brain Res. 199, 298–306 (2009).
Williams, H. Choreography of song, dance and beak movements in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3497–3506 (2001).
Trusel, M. & Roberts, T. F. Neural circuits: how the songbird brain orchestrates courtship displays. Curr. Biol. 33, R351–R353 (2023).
Ben-Tov, M., Duarte, F. & Mooney, R. A neural hub for holistic courtship displays. Curr. Biol. 33, 1640–1653 (2023).
Neubauer, R. L. Super-normal length song preferences of female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and a theory of the evolution of bird song. Evol. Ecol. 13, 365–380 (1999).
Woolley, S. C. & Doupe, A. J. Social context-induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression. PLoS Biol. 6, e62 (2008).
Collins, S. A., Hubbard, C. & Houtman, A. M. Female mate choice in the zebra finch — the effect of male beak colour and male song. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, 21–25 (1994).
Clayton, N. & Pröve, E. Song discrimination in female zebra finches and Bengalese finches. Anim. Behav. 38, 352–354 (1989).
Leadbeater, E., Goller, F. & Riebel, K. Unusual phonation, covarying song characteristics and song preferences in female zebra finches. Anim. Behav. 70, 909–919 (2005).
Ritschard, M., Riebel, K. & Brumm, H. Female zebra finches prefer high-amplitude song. Anim. Behav. 79, 877–883 (2010).
Riebel, K. in Advances in the Study of Behavior Vol. 40 (eds Naguib, M. et al.) 197–238 (Academic, 2009).
Mol, C., Bolhuis, J. J. & Moorman, S. Vocal learning in songbirds: the role of syllable order in song recognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 376, 20200248 (2021).
Geberzahn, N. & Derégnaucourt, S. Individual vocal recognition in zebra finches relies on song syllable structure rather than song syllable order. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb220087 (2020).
Lawson, S. L., Fishbein, A. R., Prior, N. H., Ball, G. F. & Dooling, R. J. Relative salience of syllable structure and syllable order in zebra finch song. Anim. Cogn. 21, 467–480 (2018).
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426 (2018).
Sainburg, T., Thielk, M. & Gentner, T. Q. Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008228 (2020).
Goffinet, J., Brudner, S., Mooney, R. & Pearson, J. Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires. eLife 10, e67855 (2021).
Sainburg, T., McInnes, L. & Gentner, T. Q. Parametric UMAP embeddings for representation and semisupervised learning. Neural Comput. 33, 2881–2907 (2021).
Spencer, K. A. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. Indicators of development as sexually selected traits: the developmental stress hypothesis in context. Behav. Ecol. 22, 1–9 (2011).
Nowicki, S., Peters, S. & Podos, J. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am. Zool. 38, 179–190 (1998).
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. & Peters, S. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the “nutritional stress hypothesis”. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188, 1003–1014 (2002).
Tchernichovski, O., Eisenberg-Edidin, S. & Jarvis, E. D. Balanced imitation sustains song culture in zebra finches. Nat. Commun. 12, 2562 (2021).
Tchernichovski, O., Nottebohm, F., Ho, C. E., Pesaran, B. & Mitra, P. P. A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim. Behav. 59, 1167–1176 (2000).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1281–1289 (2018).
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Astels, S. hdbscan: hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw. 2, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00205 (2017).